Monday, January 28, 2008

Missing monuments and Maps






Apologies for the poor quality images (I'm still figuring out the best way to photograph these pictures on glass), but I'd like people's thoughts on what I've been doing since I got home from the residency. I've been taking my panoramas of Gettysburg battlefields and very carefully scratching off the emulsion, removing all of the monuments. Other than the multitude of souvenir stores and museums in town, the only signifiers on the actual landscapes where the battles took place are the thousands of stone monuments scattered about. The monuments are put here for a variety of reasons: to note regiment movements on a particular day, to mark the location where a general was wounded, to celebrate a calvary unit, etc. Now is an odd time for the battlefield because the park service is working to "restore" the landscape to how it looked during 1863. They are cutting down full stands of trees so that visitors can see a more "realistic" view of the pastures that existed during the battle. However, they're conspicuously leaving one thing that was definitely not there at the time: the monuments. If the monuments weren't there, I wonder how that would affect people's views of the landscape, and the history of what happened here. So, I decided to scratch them out of the pictures I took. The strange thing that I wasn't expecting is that the monuments now seem to have MORE presence in the image. This is all a continuation of my exploration of how landscape and memory are intertwined.

I am now also looking quite a bit at maps. I've always been attracted to maps and mapping, and as a kid I would spend hours poring over maps of farwaway places and planning hypothetical trips to them. On day 1 we'd go here. On day 2 we'd take Route whatever south to this place and hike this trail, etc. I still do this kind of thing (and I can't wait to get a handheld GPS unit so I can go geocaching!). Anyway, as a way of exploring all of the various landscapes I've called home over the years, I've begun planning for a series I call "personal conquests." Using USGS topographical maps of the areas I've lived in, I'm zooming into the areas where I used to live and imagining "conquests" and "defenses" of these properties. When you go to a place like Gettysburg (or if you open a social studies textbook from high school) you see lots of maps with red and blue lines and arrows that represent troop movements on them, like the one seen here printed in a TravelBrains guide. I've always been intrigued with maps like this, and I want to play with the very male, western notion of ownership and property (and the way we play "war," as kids and as adults), while at the same time exploring the "lay of the land" in the places I've lived. I've lived in seven or eight different places over the years, having never really felt like any of them were permanent (except for now, a little bit more so). How would the slope of the land affect how my hypothetical "army" would attack, and defend, the lands I have called home? So far I've only made a couple mock-ups of this using transparency paper and sharpies, but I am planning on making large-scale versions with Japanese paper and encaustics. Below are two of the places I've lived: Littlestown, PA and Crawford Notch, NH.

Friday, January 25, 2008

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Meeting with Mentor

A special thanks to Liz Unterman, my new mentor and Education Coordinator at the Center for Photography at Woodstock, for meeting with me last evening (and for a wonderfully strong cup of coffee to boot!). Liz's personal work deals with many of the same issues I'm working with (place and how it affects identity, and vice versa) and so her comments will definitely help to refine my concepts. Looking forward to a great semester!

Friday, January 18, 2008

Semester Reflection/Future Plans

3rd Residency Summary
Kevin Gray

In the town I used to live in, there is a foot race called the Pit Run in which I have participated. It isn’t a particularly long race – only ten kilometers – but the way in which the race is laid out makes it seem significantly longer. About two and a half kilometers into the race, the path leaves the flat roads of the valley and begins to rise eight hundred feet or so into the surrounding hills. The halfway point of the race is reached at the top of a very steep hill, where a state college campus overlooks the countryside. For every runner who enters this race, reaching this pinnacle is an important milestone, because he or she knows that “it’s all downhill from here.” And while the downhill portion may be a little bit harder on the knees, it is a refreshing feeling to know that from here on to the finish, the heart won’t be beating quite so hard and that every stride of the legs will be longer. Once the top of the great hill is reached, every runner knows that their chances of making it to the finish line are greatly increased.

I have just reached the middle of the 2 year-long MFA program at the Art Institute of Boston and a similar feeling as above has come over me. The amount of information I’ve taken in during the past year, and the sheer volume of artwork I have created and how it has been enriched, seem absolutely overwhelming when I think about it. The first semester was basically an open invitation for me to experiment, to use any materials I wanted to explore and to investigate a series of subject matter to find common threads between theme and medium. I created Polaroid emulsion lifts, charcoal drawings, tintypes, and photos using liquid emulsion on glass. Subjects in these works included cityscapes, still lifes from an antique store, mannequin portraits, and photographs of an abandoned hotel. The second semester was more of an uphill battle as I fought to streamline my work in terms of both medium and theme. With the indispensable help of my advisor Jesseca Ferguson and artist mentor Fawn Potash, I decided to narrow my exploration to two series: a group of framed mannequin tintypes and a series of landscape panoramas of Gettysburg printed on glass. The tintype images were created to explore nostalgia in art as it related to portraiture, and how both memory and photography create artificial histories in their own ways. The landscape images were the beginning stages of another examination of nostalgia, and how certain American landscapes are recreated and preserved to record a particular moment in time. An important aspect to these works for me is the ability to speak about nostalgia without becoming purely nostalgic. These are the two bodies of work I displayed at the latest residency in January.

The most burning question on my mind as this semester began was, how do these disparate-looking series of work find a common ground (if at all), and would it be reasonable to attempt to tie both works together in a final thesis? It turns out, perhaps not surprisingly, that there were a multitude of answers to this question given to me by my peers and the professors at AIB. Some thought that it was completely possible to do so (and one professor even believed that a third project may be necessary to neatly tie it all together). Others, however, felt that coalescing both projects into one tidy thesis would be as likely as, say, effectively injecting a sports metaphor into a written report about contemporary art. If one reads the first paragraph of this paper again, it can be pretty well deduced which direction I have chosen to take. It could very well be all downhill from here.

Over the next six months I will work to further develop both the tintypes and the images on glass. I feel that both series could become very strong work, and for that reason I choose not to abandon either of them. In fact, I have a third project in mind that may help to tie the projects together, one that involves maps and mapmaking, and I do intend to explore this one during the semester as well. By the end of the semester, when my thesis outline is due, I will have developed through my work a clear answer as to what my thesis should include, and what it should not.

What follows is a list of opinions, suggestions, and questions posed to me by students and faculty at the January residency:

· Explore the idea of landscape as a place that people connect to. Why is there an emotional charge? – John Kramer
· The mannequin tintypes can be pushed farther, add more extravagant layers to the images – JK
· There is a peculiar contrast and resonance between the tintype and the mannequin. This could be enhanced by printing larger – JK
· The theme of landscape is “safer” – JK

· Work on more coherence with the tintypes, making them seem more convincing of a time period and of a cared-for, loved portrait – Jesseca Ferguson

· Nostalgia can be a tricky subject. Focus on it very deeply in both series, or just choose one series so it becomes more manageable – Sunanda Sanyal
· Explore a layered, critical approach to nostalgia through the history of American photography – SS
· The mannequin is iconic and waiting to be written about by someone, but there are richer elements in my landscape images – SS
· Is it necessary to appropriate work and processes of the past to speak about the past? – SS
· Why is America nostalgic about our history while others may not be? – SS
· Look at Hudson River School painters, Native American photography, etc. – SS
· Do not get caught up in institutional (restorative) nostalgia; keep focus on personal (reflective) nostalgia – SS
· Be cold and analytical when exploring these themes, or else face the danger of the “tearful journey” during thesis presentation – SS

· In the landscape images, do more exploration of the way history can be remembered or forgotten and how this affects the landscape – Melissa Good

· Break the boundaries in terms of both series. The tintypes should be “kitschy as hell,” by adding more elements and stretching out beyond the limits of the frames. The landscape images, as well, are too controlled. Try changing the distance between panes of glass, breaking the glass, printing images as a negative, etc. – Oscar Palacio

· Use nostalgia as the tying thread between projects. When thinking about the series, place nostalgia at the top of the list and then put three words under nostalgia for each series that describes how they differ – Deb Todd Wheeler
· Instead of choosing just one series to focus on, perhaps a third project is needed to tie things together better – DTW
· Explore “applied” history and the relationship to fakery – DTW

· Make the mannequins stand out more; add more info to the tintype to compete with info in the frame – Kate Philbrick

· Play with scale in both the tintypes and landscapes – Deborah Davidson

· The tintypes have room to grow, while the landscapes seem resolved – Laurel Sparks
· Exploit the imperfections in the photographs on glass – LS


Here are suggested artists and authors to explore:

Artists –
Joseph Cornell
Mildred Howard
Gary Winogrand
Barbara Bosworth
Joseph Sudek
Marcel Broodthaers
Native American photographers
Hudson River School painters
Jeremy Lepisto
Mary van Cline
Deborah Muirhead
Lauren Fensterstock
Sally Mann
James Casebere
Lorna Simpson
Maya Lin

Authors –
Simon Schama, Landscape and Memory
Kate Harmon, You Are Here
Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe, Beauty and the Contemporary Sublime
Kenneth Clark, Landscape Into Art
James Young, The Texture of Memory
Lucy Lippard, Overlay

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Tired, but a GOOD tired

A million gazillion thank yous to everyone for what was undoubtedly the best MFA residency yet. I'm thankful to be part of such a dedicated, talented group of students and professors. Now the task is to keep the ball rolling now that I'm back at home in NY. I was telling some friends of mine that in some ways it feels like I've been sucked into a sort of black hole because there's so much less culture here where I live than what I was experiencing in Boston for ten days. Gone is the constant discussion of art and art theory. Gone is the waking up and seeing art on walls for twelve hours a day. The blogs everyone in the program keeps, and our Super (Tired) Group page on Flickr are going to be very important to me for the next six months.

I've already started fiddling with my landscapes on glass. Been scratching emulsion off with an exacto knife. It feels good to have artists' materials in my hands again.

And I think I've got a mentor for the semester! Liz Untermann is the Education Coordinator at the Center for Photography at Woodstock, and an artist in her own right. Once her portfolio is approved by AIB, we're ready to go!

Happy working, everyone! Hope you all got home safe and sound.

Friday, November 30, 2007

Artist's Statement

I've been sick as a dog all this week, so writing is about all I've gotten done as far as MFA work is concerned. For those lucky few of you who visit my blob (heh, nice typo...I mean BLOG of course), you get the preview of my artist's statement for January. Subject to change, prices may vary by location.


"These tintype portraits and landscape photographs on glass seem to represent two disparate bodies of work, but both are grounded on a similar foundation: an exploration of memory, history, and nostalgia.

Using the rural American folk art tradition of painted photographic portraits in the 19th century, the series of tintypes could very well represent missing portraits of my own family, since I have very limited family connections and hardly any portraits to speak of. However, these images are of mannequins in an antique store near my home. They have been carefully photographed and framed with the same reverence as a real family member would be treated, with full knowledge of their artificiality. Locks of hair from the wigs worn by these mannequins (some wigs made from real human hair, others not), artificial flowers, real dried flowers, and other objects and decorations have been included with the tintypes in antique wood and plaster frames. By intentionally mixing artificial, “modern” products with objects identified as antique, I am attempting to comment on the temporal qualities of remembrance and the still photograph’s inability to be an accurate record of memory. The mannequin photographs here have no more, no less memory embedded into them than a portrait of a real human, even of a family member. Further, the reading of nostalgia in these works is skewed by the fact of their artificiality, and helps to lay bare the deceit which nostalgia holds. The simpler time one may long for while viewing these works is just as artificial as the figures in the photographs.

The liquid emulsion images on glass also use what might be termed an antiquarian photographic process to explore how memory and history are recorded in the landscape. I have made a series of landscape images in a variation of the panorama format, using a half-frame 35mm camera. These overlapping photographs depict Civil War battlefields at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Not only is this the place where over 7,500 soldiers lost their lives during three days in July, 1863, it is also where I spent the first twelve years of my life. My visit here in October of this year was only the second since my childhood, and the first where I had a true knowledge and sense of the historic events that happened there. These photographs are the beginning stages of a further investigation into the ways a landscape evolves from a space to a Place; that is, how a landscape records both a personal history and a natural and human history on a grander scale, and becomes important to understanding the human condition. By printing the landscape images on glass, I not only make a connection to photographic processes used during the Civil War era, but the ephemeral, translucent qualities of the images allow them to be read as a palimpsest, making possible the layering of images to allude to the passage of time and the constant evolution of memory and the landscape. Further adaptations of this project may include other photographs from different time periods or enlargements of maps from the region."

Thursday, November 15, 2007

It's snowing right now

...and that's just wrong. What's even wronger (is that a word?) is that we went shopping at the local mall yesterday ("local" around here means 35 miles away) and many of the stores are playing Christmas music already. It's not even Thanksgiving yet. One holiday at a time please!

As the residency gets closer and my nervousness increases, I'm trying to coalesce my ideas for the particular projects I'm working on so that I can put together a decent artist's statement. My statements tend to be overlong, rambling essays, so I reallly need to make this one more consice. Right now there are two main projects I'm pursuing: one, the mannequins, seems to be progressing nicely and I pretty much know what direction I want to head towards. The other, the Gettysburg Landscape project, is in its infancy. The panoramas on glass, or whatever I end up showing in January, are just sketches really: sketches that I have no idea how I'm going to display! They need to be spaced slightly away from the wall, which means that they'll either have to be suspended somehow or I'll have to build some sort of base for them and put them on a pedestal (which as we all know, are scarce in the AIB building). Anyhoo, I digress. Here are some quick notes on the two series which will hopefully help me build a statement that makes sense:

Mannequins

  • from the rural American tradition of 19th century portrait photography
  • possibly represents a series of "missing family portraits" for myself, since I have little family communication and very few pictures of family members
  • mannequins treated as "real," however with full knowledge of their artificial quality
  • represents the artificiality of memory, and photography's inability to be an accurate record of memory
  • comments on nostalgia through process and subject matter (reflective nostalgia)
  • painting on tintypes acts as palimpsest - erases information underneath to assign further layers of time and thought
  • addition of artificial flowers and hair placed in authentic 19th century wood & plaster frames further complicates the separation of reality and artificiality
  • notions of fetish in early portraiture
  • related artists: Morton Bartlett, Mark Ostermann, Jayne Hinds Bidaut, 19th century tintype parlor photographers

Landscapes

  • interest in landscape as a record of human and natural history - on grand scale and also personal history
  • the idea of "place" as importance to the human condition
  • landscape as memory (using Gettysburg, a landscape noted for its history and near my old hometown, as an example)
  • using a type of panorama format to investigate issues of space and composition in landscape art
  • images printed on glass to allow for layering of images (histories and memories) and also to connect to photographic techniques used during the Civil War
  • interest in maps and mapping, possible element to be introduced to series
  • comments on nostalgia through process and subject matter (reflective nostalgia)
  • related artists: Matthew Brady, Masumi Hayashi, Sally Mann

That's what I've got so far. Thoughts?